4.7 Article

Renal clearance of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoate in humans and their species-specific excretion

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 99, 期 2, 页码 253-261

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2004.12.003

关键词

perfluorooctane sulfonate; perfluorooctanoate; serum; urine; renal clearance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) are detected in the environment, as well as more specifically in wildlife and humans. However, the toxicokinetic aspects of perfluorochemicals in humans are unclear. In this study, we measured concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in subjects who had lived in Kyoto city for more than 10 years. The serum concentrations of PFOA and PFOS were higher in females who menstruated than those who did not menstruation (P < 0.01), but in mates this did not change by age; the levels in females reached those in males at an age of >= 60 years. We then determined the renal clearances of PFOA and PFOS in young (20-40 years old, N = 5 for each sex) and old (>= 60 years old, N = 5 for each sex) subjects of both sexes. All young females were menstruating, while all old females were not. The renal clearances were 10(-5)-fold smaller than the glomerular filtration rate in humans, suggesting the absence of active excretion in human kidneys. The renal clearances of PFOA and PFOS were approximately one-fifth of the total clearance based on their serum half-lives, assuming a one-compartment model. The sex differences in renal clearance that have been reported in rats and Japanese macaques were not found ill our human subjects. We tried to build a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model using the reported half-lives in human. The model was simple but could predict the serum concentrations in both males and females fairly well. We therefore suggest that all internal dose approach using a pharmacokinetic model should be taken because of the large species differences in kinetics that exist for PFOA and PFOS. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据