4.5 Article

Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?

期刊

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
卷 39, 期 11, 页码 2117-2124

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2743-5

关键词

Kinematic; Alignment; Knee; Arthroplasty; Survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the six year implant survivorship, tibial component alignment and knee and limb function measured by the Oxford Knee Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index ((WOMAC) score after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and tested the hypothesis that varus alignment of the tibial component, knee, or limb does not adversely affect implant survival and function. We prospectively followed 214 consecutive patients (219 knees) treated with a kinematically aligned TKA in 2007. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and revision rate per 100 component years determined implant failure. The Oxford Knee Score (0 worst, 48 best) and WOMAC score (0 worst, 100 best) were used to measure function. We categorised tibial component alignment as in-range (a parts per thousand currency sign 0A degrees) or varus (> 0A degrees), knee alignment as in-range (between -2.5A degrees and -7.4A degrees), varus (>-2.5A degrees), or valgus (<-7.4A degrees), and limb alignment as in-range (0A degrees aEuro parts per thousand A +/- aEuro parts per thousand 3A degrees), varus (> 3A degrees) or valgus (<-3A degrees). At a mean of 6.3 years (range, 5.8-7.2), implant survivorship was 97.5 % and revision-rate per 100 component years 0.40. Three implants had been revised (deep infection one, loose tibial component one and patella instability [1); two loose patella components were pending revision and considered failures. The average Oxford Knee Score was 43 and WOMAC 91. Function of tibial components (80 %), knees (31 %) and limbs (7 %) that were aligned in varus was similar to patients aligned in-range. At a mean of 6.3 years after kinematically aligned TKA, varus alignment of the tibial component, knee and limb did not adversely affect implant survival or function, which supports the consideration of kinematic alignment as an alternative to mechanical alignment for performing primary TKA. Level of evidence, III; therapeutic study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据