4.7 Article

The cyanobacterial lectin scytovirin displays potent in vitro and in vivo activity against Zaire Ebola virus

期刊

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 1-7

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.09.012

关键词

Ebola; Scytovirin; Lectin; Natural product; Cyanobacteria

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research and the NIAID Trans-NIH/FDA Biodefense Grant Program
  2. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health [HHSN261200800001E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cyanobacterial lectin scytovirin (SVN) binds with high affinity to mannose-rich oligosaccharides on the envelope glycoprotein (GP) of a number of viruses, blocking entry into target cells. In this study, we assessed the ability of SVN to bind to the envelope GP of Zaire Ebola virus (ZEBOV) and inhibit its replication. SVN interacted specifically with the protein's mucin-rich domain. In cell culture, it inhibited ZEBOV replication with a 50% virus-inhibitory concentration (EC50) of 50 nM, and was also active against the Angola strain of the related Marburg virus (MARV), with a similar EC50. Injected subcutaneously in mice, SVN reached a peak plasma level of 100 nm in 45 min, but was cleared within 4 h. When ZEBOV-infected mice were given 30 mg/kg/day of SVN by subcutaneous injection every 6 h, beginning the day before virus challenge, 9 of 10 animals survived the infection, while all infected, untreated mice died. When treatment was begun one hour or one day after challenge, 70-90% of mice survived. Quantitation of infectious virus and viral RNA in samples of serum, liver and spleen collected on days 2 and 5 postinfection showed a trend toward lower titers in treated than control mice, with a significant decrease in liver titers on day 2. Our findings provide further evidence of the potential of natural lectins as therapeutic agents for viral infections. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据