4.7 Article

Correlation of left atrial size with P-wave duration in interatrial block

期刊

CHEST
卷 128, 期 4, 页码 2615-2618

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2615

关键词

echocardiogram; formula; interatrial block; left atrial enlargement; P-wave duration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Interatirial block (LAB) [P-wave duration >= 110 ms] is associated with left atrial (LA) enlargement (LAE) and pathophysiologic derangements that result in atrial tachyarrhythmias, LA electromechanical dysfunction, and embolism. However, there has been no study addressing the direct correlation of P-wave duration in LAB and LAE. Methods: One hundred eighty-one consecutive patients who were admitted to a tertiary care teaching hospital over 5 consecutive days were screened for past transthoracic echocardiogram evaluations and were then matched with ECGs done within 10 days of these echocardiographic investigations. ECGs were evaluated for presence of IAB, and patients were subsequently classified into two groups: control patients and patients with LAB. Patients were also matched for common comorbidities. Mean, SD of age, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), p values, and multivariate and linear regression analyses were analyzed for the investigated variables of LA size, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), posterior wall thickness, septal thickness, and P-wave duration. Results: From the sample (n = 66; mean age +/- SD, 71.3 +/- 13.7; female gender, 48.5%), the mean LA size in the control group was 36.7 +/- 4.01 mm and for the group of patients with IAB (n = 38) was 42.2 +/- 7.25 mm (p = 0.004). Linear regression analysis revealed that P-wave duration was significantly correlated with LA size (p = 0.0002, r = 0.606). Conclusions: Degree of conduction delay in IAB (P-wave duration) is an independent, direct correlate of LAE, and the regression equation (LA size [in millimeters] = 2.47 +/- 0.29 x P-wave duration [in milliseconds]) could be used to estimate LAE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据