4.7 Article

Identification of a novel resistance mutation for benzimidazole inhibitors of the HCV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase

期刊

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 30-38

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.10.012

关键词

Hepatitis C virus; Non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor; Benzimidazole; Resistance

资金

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [G.0728.09N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-nucleoside inhibitors of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of the hepatitis C virus that are based on a benzimidazole or indole scaffold have been reported to interact with thumb domain I of the enzyme. Escape mutants that confer in vitro resistance to these inhibitors map to amino acids P495, P496 or V499. We here report a novel resistance mutation (T389S/A) that was identified following resistance selection with the benzimidazole non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor JT-16 in HCV Con-1 subgenomic replicon (genotype 1b). This JT-16 resistant replicon retained wild-type susceptibility to protease inhibitors and nucleoside polymerase inhibitors. Replicons that carry mutations T389A and T389S have moderate levels of resistance to JT-16 (7- and 13-fold, respectively). Mutation P495A is associated with high-level (44-fold) resistance. Surprisingly, this previously reported 'key' mutation for benzimidazole resistance, P495A, was detected in only 15% of the resistant population. Furthermore, the replication fitness of the T389S mutant was significantly higher than that of the P495A mutant. By means of molecular modeling a structural hypothesis was formulated to explain the emergence of the T389S/A mutation in the JT-16 resistant replicon. Our data demonstrate that low-level resistant, but fit, variants can develop during in vitro resistance selection with the benzimidazole inhibitor JT-16. Moreover, different substitutions to the benzimidazole scaffold can affect the (pattern of) resistance mutations that emerge during resistance selection. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据