4.6 Article

Susceptibility of the developing brain to acute hypoglycemia involving A1 adenosine receptor activation

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00112.2005

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS054310] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been suggested that the developing brain is less vulnerable to the adverse effects of hypoglycemia than the mature brain; however, this issue remains controversial. We also do not know the magnitude or duration of hypoglycemia needed to trigger hypoglycemic brain injury during development. To address this issue a series of in vivo and in vitro studies were performed. First, we established an acute model of insulin-induced hypoglycemia in mice by administering 3 U/kg of neutral-protamine Hagadorn insulin subcutaneously. When we examined degenerating neurons in hippocampus and striatum by TUNEL labeling, injury was observed after 4 h of hypoglycemia in postnatal day ( P) 7 mice, and we observed more cell injury in animals rendered hypoglycemic at P7 than at P21. Studies of hippocampal slice cultures revealed that reduction in glucose concentration induced more neuronal injury in slices prepared from P3 and P7 than from P14 and P21 mice. Treatment of slices with an adenosine A(1) receptor (A(1)AR) antagonist reduced the hypoglycemic damage, whereas agonists increased damage, particularly in slices prepared from very young pups. This suggests a critically important role for A(1)ARs, which was further demonstrated by the reduction of hypoglycemic damage in hippocampal slices prepared from A(1)AR(-/-) mice. Furthermore, insulin-induced hypoglycemia in P7 A(1)AR(-/-) mice did not increase TUNEL-positive cells, but a major increase was seen in A(1)AR(+/-) mice. These observations show that the developing nervous system is indeed sensitive to acute hypoglycemic injury and that A(1)AR activation contributes to damage induced by hypoglycemia, particularly in immature mouse brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据