4.7 Article

Purification and characterization of NAD(P)H-dependent nitroreductase I from Klebsiella sp C1 and enzymatic transformation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 68, 期 6, 页码 766-773

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-005-1950-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three NAD(P)H-dependent nitroreductases that can transform 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) by two reduction pathways were detected in Klebsiella sp. C1. Among these enzymes, the protein with the highest reduction activity of TNT (nitroreductase I) was purified to homogeneity using ion-exchange, hydrophobic interaction, and size exclusion chromatographies. Nitroreductase I has a molecular mass of 27 kDa as determined by SDS-PAGE, and exhibits a broad pH optimum between 5.5 and 6.5, with a temperature optimum of 30-40 degrees C. Flavin mononucleotide is most likely the natural flavin cofactor of this enzyme. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of this enzyme does not show a high degree of sequence similarity with nitroreductases from other enteric bacteria. This enzyme catalyzed the two-electron reduction of several nitroaromatic compounds with very high specific activities of NADPH oxidation. In the enzymatic transformation of TNT, 2-amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene and 2,2',6,6'-tetranitro-4,4'-azoxytoluene were detected as transformation products. Although this bacterium utilizes the direct ring reduction and subsequent denitration pathway together with a nitro group reduction pathway, metabolites in direct ring reduction of TNT could not easily be detected. Unlike other nitroreductases, nitroreductase I was able to transform hydroxylaminodinitrotoluenes (HADNT) into aminodinitrotoluenes (ADNT), and could reduce ortho isomers (2-HADNT and 2-ADNT) more easily than their para isomers (4-HADNT and 4-ADNT). Only the nitro group in the ortho position of 2,4-DNT was reduced to produce 2-hydroxylamino-4-nitrotoluene by nitroreductase I; the nitro group in the para position was not reduced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据