4.7 Article

ISG15 over-expression inhibits replication of the Japanese encephalitis virus in human medulloblastoma cells

期刊

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
卷 85, 期 3, 页码 504-511

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.12.007

关键词

IFN-stimulated gene 15; Japanese encephalitis virus; IRF-3; JAK2; STAT1

资金

  1. National Science Council (Taiwan)
  2. China Medical University [NSC96-2320-B-039-008-MY3, CMU97-140, CMU97-CMC-020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IFN-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15), an ubiquitin-like protein, is rapidly induced by IFN-alpha/beta, and ISG15 conjugation is associated with the antiviral immune response. Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), a mosquito-borne neurotropic flavivirus, causes severe central nervous system diseases. We investigated the potential anti-JEV effect of ISG15 over-expression. ISG15 over-expression in human medulloblastoma cells significantly reduced the JEV-induced cytopathic effect and inhibited JEV replication by reducing the viral titers and genomes (p < 0.05, Student's t-test); it also increased activation of the interferon stimulatory response element (ISRE)-luciferase cis-acting reporter in JEV-infected cells (p < 0.05, Chi-square test). Furthermore, Western blotting revealed that ISG15 over-expression increased phosphorylation of IRF-3 (Ser396), JAK2 (Tyr1007/1008) and STAT1 (Tyr701 and Ser727) in JEV-infected cells (P < 0.05, Chi-square test). Confocal imaging indicated that nucleus translocation of transcription factor STAT1 occurred in ISG15-over-expressing cells but not in vector control cells post-JEV infection. ISG15 over-expression activated the expression of STAT1-dependent genes including IRF-3, IFN-beta, IL-8, PKR and OAS before and post-JEV infection (p = 0.063, Student's t-test). The results enabled elucidation of the molecular mechanism of ISG15 over-expression against JEV, which will be useful for developing a novel treatment to combat JEV infection. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据