4.6 Article

Epidemiology and outcome of infections due to Aspergillus terreus:: 10-year single centre experience

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 131, 期 2, 页码 201-207

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05763.x

关键词

Aspergillus terreus; infections; environment; epidemiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aspergillus terreus, a less common pathogen, appears to be an emerging cause of infection at our institution, the Medical University Hospital of Innsbruck. Thus the epidemiology and outcome of A. terreus infections over the past 10 years was assessed. We analysed 67 cases of proven invasive aspergillosis (IA) according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria, investigated antifungal susceptibility of amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole and caspofungin and performed molecular typing of A. terreus. Patients with proven IA caused by A. terreus (n = 32) and non-A. terreus (n = 35) were evaluated. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, underlying disease, antifungal prophylaxis and duration of neutropenia (P > 0.05). Leukaemia was the most common underlying malignancy. Fungal dissemination occurred in 63% of the patients. Aspergillus terreus infections were associated with a lower response rate to AMB therapy (20%), compared with 47% for patients with non-A. terreus infections (P < 0.05). In vitro, A. terreus was found to be resistant to AMB and molecular typing discriminated between patients isolates, showing a high strain diversity with 26 distinct types (I-XXVI) identified by combination of three primers. Aspergillus terreus infections displayed evidence of AMB resistance in vitro and in vivo and were associated with a high rate of dissemination and poor outcome; A. terreus causes systemic infections of endemic character in Tyrol, Austria. The onset of A. terreus infection depends not on the degree of immunosuppression but on environmental Aspergillus spp. exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据