4.1 Article

Identification of a very large Rab GTPase family in the parasitic protozoan Trichomonas vaginalis

期刊

MOLECULAR AND BIOCHEMICAL PARASITOLOGY
卷 143, 期 2, 页码 226-235

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2005.06.008

关键词

Rab; evolution; diversity; phylogeny; amoeba

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rab proteins are pivotal components of the membrane trafficking machinery in all eukaryotes. Distinct Rab proteins locate to specific endomembrane compartments and genomic studies suggest that Rab gene diversity correlates with endomembrane system complexity; for example unicellular organisms generally possess 5-20 Rab family members and the size of the repertoire increases to 25-60 in multicellular systems. Here we report 65 open reading frames from the unicellular protozoan Trichomonas vaginalis that encode distinct Rab proteins (TvRabs), indicating a family with complexity that rivals Homo sapiens in number. The detection of gene transcripts for the majority of these genes and conservation of functional motifs strongly suggests that TvRabs retain functionality and likely roles in membrane trafficking. The T vaginalis Rab family includes orthologues of the conserved subfamilies, Rab1, Rab5, Rab6, Rab7 and Rab11, but the majority of TvRabs are not represented by orthologues in other systems and includes six novel T vaginalis specific Rab subfamilies (A-F). The extreme size of the T vaginalis Rab family, the presence of novel subfamilies plus the divergent nature of many TvRab sequences suggest both the presence of a highly complex endomembrane system within Trichomonas and potentially novel Rab functionality. A family of more than 65 Rab genes in a unicellular genome is unexpected, but may be a requirement for progression though an amoeboid life-cycle phase as both Dictyostelium discoideum and Entamoeba histolytica share with T vaginalis both an amoeboid life cycle stage and very large Rab gene families. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据