4.5 Article

Multi-step fibrinogen binding to the integrin αllbβ3 detected using force spectroscopy

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 89, 期 4, 页码 2824-2834

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.061887

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL040387, R01 HL030954, P01 HL062250, HL40387, HL62250, HL30954, HL57407] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The regulated ability of integrin alpha llb beta 3 to bind fibrinogen plays a crucial role in platelet aggregation and hemostasis. We have developed a model system based on laser tweezers, enabling us to measure specific rupture forces needed to separate single receptor-ligand complexes. First of all, we performed a thorough and statistically representative analysis of nonspecific protein-protein binding versus specific alpha llb beta 3-fibrinogen interactions in combination with experimental evidence for single-molecule measurements. The rupture force distribution of purified alpha llb beta 3 and fibrinogen, covalently attached to underlying surfaces, ranged from; 20 to 150 pN. This distribution could be fit with a sum of an exponential curve for weak to moderate (20-60 pN) forces, and a Gaussian curve for strong (> 60 pN) rupture forces that peaked at 80-90 pN. The interactions corresponding to these rupture force regimes differed in their susceptibility to alpha llb beta 3 antagonists or Mn2+, an alpha llb beta 3 activator. Varying the surface density of fibrinogen changed the total binding probability linearly > 3.5-fold but did not affect the shape of the rupture force distribution, indicating that the measurements represent single-molecule binding. The yield strength of alpha llb beta 3-fibrinogen interactions was independent of the loading rate (160-16,000 pN/s), whereas their binding probability markedly correlated with the duration of contact. The aggregate of data provides evidence for complex multi-step binding/unbinding pathways of alpha llb beta 3 and fibrinogen revealed at the single-molecule level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据