4.6 Article

Restoration of gibberellin production in Fusarium proliferatum by functional complementation of enzymatic blocks

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 71, 期 10, 页码 6014-6025

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.10.6014-6025.2005

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004161] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004161] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nine biological species, or mating populations (MPs), denoted by letters A to 1, and at least 29 anamorphic Fusarium species have been identified within the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Members of this species complex are the only species of the genus Fusarium that contain the gibberellin (GA) biosynthetic gene cluster or at least parts of it. However, the ability of fusaria to produce GAs is so far restricted to Fusarium fujikuroi, although at least six other MPs contain all the genes of the GA biosynthetic gene cluster. Members of Fusarium proliferatum, the closest related species, have lost the ability to produce GAs as a result of the accumulation of several mutations in the coding and 5' noncoding regions of genes P450-4 and P450-1, both encoding cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, resulting in metabolic blocks at the early stages of GA biosynthesis. In this study, we have determined additional enzymatic blocks at the first specific steps in the GA biosynthesis pathway of F. prolifieratum: the synthesis of geranylgeranyl diphosphate and the synthesis of ent-kaurene. Complementation of these enzymatic blocks by transferring the corresponding genes from GA-producing F. fujikuroi to F. proliferatum resulted in the restoration of GA production. We discuss the reasons for Fusarium species outside the G. fiujikuroi species complex having no GA biosynthetic genes, whereas species distantly related to Fusarium, e.g., Sphaceloma spp. and Phaeosphaeria spp., produce GAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据