4.7 Article

Prevalence of positional sleep apnea in patients undergoing polysomnography

期刊

CHEST
卷 128, 期 4, 页码 2130-2137

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2130

关键词

body posture; breathing disturbances; human sleep; obstructive sleep apnea; polysomnography; sleep apnea; sleep disorders; sleep position

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study objectives: The primary aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of positional obstructive sleep apnea using a functional definition. Positional sleep apnea was defined as a total apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) >= 5 with a > 50% reduction in the AHI between the supine and nonsupine postures, and an AHI that normalizes (AHI < 5) in the nonsupine posture. A secondary aim was to determine if positional sleep apnea can be diagnosed accurately during a split-night study. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Two sleep centers in Buffalo, NY, one a Veterans Affairs Western New York Healthcare System Sleep Center (VAWNY) and the other a freestanding ambulatory center (Associated Sleep Center [ASC]). Patients: Three hundred twenty-six patients from the VAWNY, including 57 patients who underwent a split-night study and 242 patients from the ASC who underwent polysomnography. Interventions: None. Measurements: Patient characteristics and sleep study results. Results: Positional sleep apnea was seen in 49 of 99 patients (49.5%) with mild sleep apnea (AHI, 5 to 15/h), 14 of 72 patients (19.4%) with moderate sleep apnea (AHI, 15 to 30/h), and 5 of 77 patients (6.5%) with severe sleep apnea (AHI > 30/h). Sufficient sleep (> 15 min) in both postures was not seen in 104 of 269 patients (38.7%) and 80 of 242 overnight studies (33.1%) at the VAWNY and ASC, respectively, and was not seen in 47 of 57 split-night studies (82.5%). The percentage of studies with insufficient sleep in both postures was significantly greater for split-night studies (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Positional sleep apnea is common particularly in patients with mild disease. Positional sleep apnea cannot usually be assessed during a split-night study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据