4.8 Article

Molecular mechanisms of extensive mitochondrial gene rearrangement in plethodontid salamanders

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 2104-2112

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi204

关键词

complete mitochondrial genomes; gene rearrangement; tandem duplication; pseudogenes; plethodontids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extensive gene rearrangement is reported in the mitochondrial genomes of lungless salamanders ( Plethodontidae). In each genome with a novel gene order, there is evidence that the rearrangement was mediated by duplication of part of the mitochondrial genome, including the presence of both pseudogenes and additional, presumably functional, copies of duplicated genes. All rearrangement- mediating duplications include either the origin of light- strand replication and the nearby tRNA genes or the regions flanking the origin of heavy- strand replication. The latter regions comprise nad6, trnE, cob, trnT, an intergenic spacer between trnT and trnP and, in some genomes, trnP, the control region, trnF, rrnS, trnV, rrnL, trnL1, and nad1. In some cases, two copies of duplicated genes, presumptive regulatory regions, and/ or sequences with no assignable function have been retained in the genome following the initial duplication; in other genomes, only one of the duplicated copies has been retained. Both tandem and nontandem duplications are present in these genomes, suggesting different duplication mechanisms. In some of these mitochondrial DNAs, up to 25% of the total length is composed of tandem duplications of noncoding sequence that includes putative regulatory regions and/ or pseudogenes of tRNAs and protein- coding genes along with the otherwise unassignable sequences. These data indicate that imprecise initiation and termination of replication, slipped- strand mispairing, and intramolecular recombination may all have played a role in generating repeats during the evolutionary history of plethodontid mitochondrial genomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据