4.7 Review

Extracellular Matrix and Liver Disease

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 1078-1097

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2013.5697

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [5R01 DK069286, 2R56 DK069286, 3 R56 DK069286-06S1]
  2. US Public Health Service [U01 AA021887-01, 5 P20 AA017067, 5 P20 AA017067-01S1]
  3. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [5 P20 AA017067-03S1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significance: The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a dynamic microenvironment that undergoes continuous remodeling, particularly during injury and wound healing. Chronic liver injury of many different etiologies such as viral hepatitis, alcohol abuse, drug-induced liver injury, obesity and insulin resistance, metabolic disorders, and autoimmune disease is characterized by excessive deposition of ECM proteins in response to persistent liver damage. Critical Issues: This review describes the main collagenous and noncollagenous components from the ECM that play a significant role in pathological matrix deposition during liver disease. We define how increased myofibroblasts (MF) from different origins are at the forefront of liver fibrosis and how liver cell-specific regulation of the complex scarring process occurs. Recent Advances: Particular attention is paid to the role of cytokines, growth factors, reactive oxygen species, and newly identified matricellular proteins in the regulation of fibrillar type I collagen, a field to which our laboratory has significantly contributed over the years. We compile data from recent literature on the potential mechanisms driving fibrosis resolution such as MF' apoptosis, senescence, and reversal to quiescence. Future Directions: We conclude with a brief description of how epigenetics, an evolving field, can regulate the behavior of MF and of how new omics'' tools may advance our understanding of the mechanisms by which the fibrogenic response to liver injury occurs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据