4.6 Article

Frequent HRK inactivation associated with low apoptotic index in secondary glioblastomas

期刊

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
卷 110, 期 4, 页码 402-410

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-005-1065-x

关键词

HRK; secondary glioblastoma; primary glioblastoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To detect and identify the genetic alterations and methylation status of the HRK gene in human glioblastomas, we analyzed a cohort of astrocytic tumors for hypermethylation, loss of heterozygosity on 12q13.1, and gene expression. Our study examined a series of 36 diffuse low-grade astrocytomas, 32 anaplastic astrocytomas, 64 primary glioblastomas, and 28 secondary glioblastomas that had evolved from either 24 low-grade diffuse astrocytomas or 4 anaplastic astrocytomas. The region around the HRK transcription start site was methylated in 19% of diffuse astrocytomas, in 22% of anaplastic astrocytomas, in 27% of primary glioblastomas, and in 43% of secondary glioblastomas. HRK expression was significantly reduced in 61% of secondary glioblastomas as compared to other types of tumors, and aberrant methylation was closely associated with loss of expression. Reverse transcription-PCR analysis also demonstrated a clear agreement between reduced HRK protein levels and low or absent HRK transcripts. Lack of HRK immunoreactivity was significantly correlated with a low apoptotic index, whereas a strong association between methylation status and apoptosis was found only in secondary glioblastomas. Abnormal methylation of HRK was detected in astrocytic tumors concurrent with methylation of multiple genes, including p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF). Interestingly, these epigenetic changes in secondary glioblastoma were further associated with wild-type p53. Our findings suggest that HRK is inactivated mainly by aberrant DNA methylation in astrocytic tumors and that reduced HRK expression contributes to the loss of apoptotic control in high-grade tumors. Reduced expression of HRK may serve as one important molecular mechanism in progression to secondary glioblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据