4.7 Review

Hydrogen Peroxide and Nitric Oxide: Key Regulators of the Legume-Rhizobium and Mycorrhizal Symbioses

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 18, 期 16, 页码 2202-2219

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2012.5136

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significance: During the Legume-Rhizobium symbiosis, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and nitric oxide (NO) appear to play an important signaling role in the establishment and the functioning of this interaction. Modifications of the levels of these reactive species in both partners impair either the development of the nodules (new root organs formed on the interaction) or their N-2-fixing activity. Recent Advances: NADPH oxidases (Noxs) have been recently described as major sources of H2O2 production, via superoxide anion dismutation, during symbiosis. Nitrate reductases (NR) and electron transfer chains from both partners were found to significantly contribute to NO production in N-2-fixing nodules. Both S-sulfenylated and S-nitrosylated proteins have been detected during early interaction and in functioning nodules, linking reactive oxygen species (ROS)/NO production to redox-based protein regulation. NO was also found to play a metabolic role in nodule energy metabolism. Critical Issues: H2O2 may control the infection process and the subsequent bacterial differentiation into the symbiotic form. NO is required for an optimal establishment of symbiosis and appears to be a key player in nodule senescence. Future Directions: A challenging question is to define more precisely when and where reactive species are generated and to develop adapted tools to detect their production in vivo. To investigate the role of Noxs and NRs in the production of H2O2 and NO, respectively, the use of mutants under the control of organ-specific promoters will be of crucial interest. The balance between ROS and NO production appears to be a key point to understand the redox regulation of symbiosis. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 18, 2202-2219.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据