4.7 Review

Regulation of Mercaptopyruvate Sulfurtransferase Activity Via Intrasubunit and Intersubunit Redox-Sensing Switches

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 19, 期 15, 页码 1792-U161

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2012.5031

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan [24580392]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24580392, 24590392] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significance: Redox regulates 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MST, EC 2.8.1.2) activity via both intermolecular and intramolecular redox-sensing switches. The intermolecular switch comprises an intermolecular disulfide bond that forms a homodimer. On the other hand, the intramolecular switch is a catalytic site cysteine that forms a low redox potential sulfenate. Both switches are reduced by thioredoxin with the reducing system, including thioredoxin reductase and NADPH, and to a much lesser extent by reduced glutathione. It becomes clear that MST serves as not only an enzyme in cysteine catabolism, but also as an antioxidant protein. Recent Advances: New findings have been accumulated that, in the catalytic process of MST, hydrogen peroxide is possibly produced by persulfide of the sulfur-accepted substrate and sulfur oxides are possibly produced in the redox cycle of persulfide formed at the catalytic site cysteine of the reaction intermediate. Further, we recently succeeded to produce MST knockout (KO) mice. Critical Issues: A congenital metabolic disorder, mercaptolactate-cysteine disulfiduria (MCDU) is caused by MST defect with or without mental retardation. The MST KO mouse is just a MCDU model. Recent findings suggest that hydrogen sulfide and/or sulfur oxides are involved in the neurobehavioral changes in MCDU. Future Directions: We investigate the pathogenesis of MCDU by performing a comprehensive analysis of the MST KO mice to clarify the functional diversity of MST and biological importance of hydrogen sulfide and sulfur oxides in the brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据