4.7 Review

NADPH Oxidases as Regulators of Tumor Angiogenesis: Current and Emerging Concepts

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 1229-1247

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2011.4489

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia NHMRC [545942, 519539]
  2. Cancer Council of Victoria [606674]
  3. National Heart Foundation of Australia (NHFA) [G08M3720, PF/0M5418]
  4. Victorian Government
  5. NHMRC [606472, APP1006017]
  6. Monash Larkins Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significance: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and peroxynitrite are generated ubiquitously by all mammalian cells and have been understood for many decades as inflicting cell damage and as causing cancer by oxidation and nitration of macromolecules, including DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids. Recent Advances: A current concept suggests that ROS can also promote cell signaling pathways triggered by growth factors and transcription factors that ultimately regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, all of which are important hallmarks of tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Moreover, an emerging concept indicates that ROS regulate the functions of immune cells that infiltrate the tumor environment and stimulate angiogenesis, such as macrophages and specific regulatory T cells. Critical Issues: In this article, we highlight that the NADPH oxidase family of ROS-generating enzymes are the key sources of ROS and, thus, play an important role in redox signaling within tumor, endothelial, and immune cells thereby promoting tumor angiogenesis. Future Directions: Knowledge of these intricate ROS signaling pathways and identification of the culprit NADPH oxidases is likely to reveal novel therapeutic opportunities to prevent angiogenesis that occurs during cancer and which is responsible for the revascularization after current antiangiogenic treatment. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 16, 1229-1247.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据