4.6 Article

Differences in left ventricular long-axis function from mice to humans follow allometric scaling to ventricular size

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 568, 期 1, 页码 255-265

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.090779

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [MO1 RR-018390, M01 RR018390] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While the heart size maintains a constant proportion to body size, heart function parameters, such as heart rate and cardiac output, show a more complex scaling pattern. How these phenomena affect the long-axis left ventricular (LV) function is unknown. We studied 10 mice, 15 rats, 6 rabbits, 8 mongrel dogs and 38 human volunteers. Doppler tissue echocardiography data were postprocessed to reconstruct mitral annulus (MA) peak systolic velocity and displacement. The relationship between MA peak velocity, MA displacement and LV ejection time, and LV end-diastolic volume (and mass) were fit to an allometric (power-law) equation Y = kM(beta). LV mass varied from 0.062 to 255 g, while end-diastolic volume varied from 0.014 to 205 ml. beta values of the relation between LV ejection time and LV end-diastolic volume and mass were 0.247 +/- 0.017 and 0.267 +/- 0.018, respectively. beta values of the relationship between MA displacement and LV end-diastolic volume and mass were 0.358 +/- 0.047 and 0.390 +/- 0.051 (P < 0.023 versus beta of LV ejection time). beta values of the relationship between MA peak systolic velocity and LV end-diastolic volume and mass were 0.096 +/- 0.012 and 0.100 +/- 0.013, respectively (P < 0.0001 versus 0). Finally, beta values of the relationship between the long-to-short axis displacement ratio and LV end-diastolic volume and mass were 0.077 +/- 0.017 and 0.086 +/- 0.019 (P < 0.0001 versus 0). We conclude that MA velocity, displacement, and long-to-short axis displacement ratio scale allometrically to heart size. This reduces the relative long-axis contribution to heart function in small mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据