4.7 Article

Material hardship alters the diurnal rhythm of salivary cortisol

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 1138-1143

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyi120

关键词

cortisol rhythm; chronic stress; material hardship; regression splines; awakening cortisol response; socioeconomic

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P50 HD38986, R24 HD047861-01, R24 HD047861] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH01931] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In the quest for biological mechanisms underlying socioeconomic differences in health outcomes, attention has turned to the role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. As there is some evidence that both acute and chronic stress raise cortisol levels, and material hardship is a stressor, we examined the relationship of chronic material hardship with salivary cortisol levels over the day. Methods The data are from a survey of a sample of poor women aged 18-54. Up to four repeated measures of salivary cortisol levels were obtained from 188 women in this sample and modelled as a diurnal profile. Self-reports of a variety of sources of material hardship over the preceding year were combined into a single scale. Specific dimensions of the subjects' cortisol profiles were compared across levels of material hardship. Results Salivary cortisol varied over the day, and by level of reported material hardship. Upon awakening, salivary cortisol levels were comparable across hardship levels. But soon after waking, women at low levels of hardship experienced both a significantly sharper morning surge and subsequently a sharper decline in salivary cortisol (16.0 and 29.5 nmol/l/h) than women with high hardship levels (5.9 and 24.3 nmol/l/h). These differences in cortisol diurnal pattern tended to be related in a dose-response way to levels of material hardship. Conclusions Material hardship among poor women is associated with changes in the diurnal rhythms of cortisol, particularly in the waking response, which is blunted in women with high levels of hardship.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据