4.7 Review

Regulation of Endothelial Function by Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 1517-1530

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2010.3642

关键词

-

资金

  1. Atlantic Philanthropies, Inc. [K23HL089326, 10GRNT3880044]
  2. American Heart Association [K23HL089326, 10GRNT3880044]
  3. John A. Hartford Foundation [K23HL089326, 10GRNT3880044]
  4. Association of Specialty Physicians [K23HL089326, 10GRNT3880044]
  5. Greater Milwaukee Foundation
  6. [HL094971]
  7. [HL080704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria are well known for their central roles in ATP production, calcium homeostasis, and heme and steroid biosynthesis. However, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide and hydrogen peroxide, once thought to be toxic byproducts of mitochondrial physiologic activities, have recently been recognized as important cell-signaling molecules in the vascular endothelium, where their production, conversion, and destruction are highly regulated. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species appear to regulate important vascular homeostatic functions under basal conditions in a variety of vascular beds, where, in particular, they contribute to endothelium-dependent vasodilation. On exposure to cardiovascular risk factors, endothelial mitochondria produce excessive ROS in concert with other cellular ROS sources. Mitochondrial ROS, in this setting, act as important signaling molecules activating prothrombotic and proinflammatory pathways in the vascular endothelium, a process that initially manifests itself as endothelial dysfunction and, if persistent, may lead to the development of atherosclerotic plaques. This review concentrates on emerging appreciation of the importance of mitochondrial ROS as cell-signaling molecules in the vascular endothelium under both physiologic and pathophysiologic conditions. Future potential avenues of research in this field also are discussed. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 15, 1517-1530.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据