4.7 Article

Increased muscle protein breakdown in chronic hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 68, 期 4, 页码 1857-1865

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00605.x

关键词

dialysis; diabetes; metabolism; nutrition

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01RR 00095] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK26657, 1K24 DK62849, R01 DK45604] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients has potential to increase body protein losses and muscle wasting. Methods. In this study, we examined whole-body and skeletal muscle protein metabolism in 6 CHD patients with type 2 (T2) DM (2 male, 44.4 +/- 6.1 years old, 2 white/4 African American HbA(1)C = 9.5 +/- 1.1%), and 6 non-DM CHD patients (2 male, 43.3 +/- 6.7 years old, 2 white/4 African American) in a fasting state, using a primed-constant infusion of L-(1-C-13) leucine and L-(ring-H-2(5)) phenylalanine. Results. CHD patients with T2DM had significantly increased (83%) skeletal muscle protein breakdown (137 +/- 27 vs. 75 +/- 25 mu g/100 mL/min). There was no significant difference in muscle protein synthesis between groups (78 +/- 27 vs. 66 +/- 21 mu g/100 mL/min, for DM and non-DM respectively), resulting in significantly more negative net protein balance in the muscle compartment in the DM group (-59 +/- 4 vs. -9 +/- 6 mu g/100 mL/min, P < 0.05). A similar trend was observed in whole-body protein synthesis and breakdown. Plasma glucose levels were 113 +/- 16 and 71 +/- 2 mg/dL, P < 0.05, and insulin levels were 25.3 +/- 9.6 and 7.3 +/- 1.0 uU/mL, for DM versus non-DM, respectively, P < 0.05. No significant differences between DM and non-DM were found in other metabolic hormones. Conclusion. The results of this study demonstrate that CHD patients with T2DM under a suboptimal metabolic control display accelerated muscle protein loss compared with a matched group of non-DM CHD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据