4.6 Article

Low dose of S(+)-ketamine prevents long-term potentiation in pain pathways under strong opioid analgesia in the rat spinal cord in vivo

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 95, 期 4, 页码 518-523

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei215

关键词

anaesthetics i.v., ketamine; analgesia, pre-emptive; analgesics, opioid, fentanyl; model, rat; spinal cord, c-fibres

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. mu-Opioid receptor (MOR) agonists are strong antinociceptive drugs. Low, but not high doses of the MOR agonist fentanyl prevent synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP) in pain pathways. Block of spinal N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors prevent central sensitization. Here we tested whether the NMDA receptor antagonist S(+)-ketamine reduces C-fibre-evoked potentials and prevents induction of LTP despite high doses of fentanyl. Methods. C-fibre-evoked field potentials were recorded in the superficial laminae I/II of the rat lumbar spinal cord. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) was applied to the sciatic nerve at C-fibre strength to induce LTP. S(+)-ketamine 5 mg kg(-1) was given 1 h before or after HFS. S(+)-ketamine 5 mg kg(-1) and fentanyl as a bolus ( 40 mg kg(-1)) followed by an infusion (96 mu g kg(-1) h(-1)) were given before HFS to test the action of the combination of these drugs. Results. HFS potentiated C-fibre-evoked field potentials to mean 173 (SEM 15)% of control (n = 7) for at least 1 h. Low-dose S(+)-ketamine given before HFS blocked the induction of LTP. S(+)-ketamine given after HFS had no effect on the maintenance of LTP. Low-dose S(+)-ketamine prevented induction of LTP under fentanyl-infusion. Conclusions. Low-dose S(+)-ketamine does not affect C-fibre-evoked potentials alone but blocks LTP induction in pain pathways. In contrast, high doses of opioids strongly reduce C-fibre-evoked potentials, but do not fully prevent LTP induction. In this animal study the combination of S(+)-ketamine with fentanyl reveals both a reduction of C-fibre-evoked potentials and prevention of LTP and seem therefore a better choice for perioperative pain management compared with the sole administration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据