4.7 Article

B- to Plasma-Cell Terminal Differentiation Entails Oxidative Stress and Profound Reshaping of the Antioxidant Responses

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 1133-1144

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2009.3079

关键词

-

资金

  1. AIRC
  2. Cariplo
  3. Compagnia San Paolo
  4. Ministero Universita e Ricerca
  5. Ministero Salute
  6. Telethon
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0052293, M10642040001-07N4204-00110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limited amounts of reactive oxygen species are necessary for cell survival and signaling, but their excess causes oxidative stress. H2O2 and other reactive oxygen species are formed as byproducts of several metabolic pathways, possibly including oxidative protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. B- to plasma-cell differentiation is characterized by a massive expansion of the endoplasmic reticulum, finalized to sustain abundant immunoglobulin (Ig) synthesis and secretion. The increased production of disulfide-rich Ig might cause oxidative stress that could serve signaling roles in the differentiation and lifespan control of antibody-secreting cells. Here we show that terminal B-cell differentiation entails redox stress, NF-E2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) activation, and reshaping of the antioxidant responses. However, plasma-cell differentiation was not dramatically impaired in peroxiredoxin (Prx)1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-, glutathione peroxidase 1-, and Nrf2-knockout splenocytes, suggesting redundancy and robustness in antioxidant systems. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident Prx4 increases dramatically during differentiation. In its absence, IgM secretion was not significantly affected, but more high-molecular-weight covalent complexes accumulated intracellularly. Our results suggest that the early intracellular production of H2O2 facilitates B-cell proliferation and reveal a role for the Nrf2 pathway in the differentiation and function of IgM-secreting cells. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 13, 1133-1144.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据