4.3 Article

Development of a novel serum-free freezing medium for mammalian cells using the silk protein sericin

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 183-188

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BA20050019

关键词

cryopreservation; freezing medium; insect cell; mammalian cell; sericin; silk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cryopreservation is a pivotal process in cellular engineering for creating a continuous source of generated functional cell lines and for the convenience of various medical treatments that involve cell culture. FBS (fetal bovine serum) supplemented with 10% (v/v) DMSO is extensively used as a freezing medium for mammalian cells using conventional methods. However, FBS should ideally be avoided, owing to serious concerns regarding bovine spongiform encephalopathy and other infections such as viruses, and an alternative to FBS is eagerly awaited. Furthermore, biomedicines and cells for transplantation should not be infectious. The present study aimed to develop a novel serum-free freezing medium. For this purpose, we focused on using the silk protein sericin as a cryoprotectant for storage and developed a novel serum-free freezing medium consisting of PBS, 1 % (v/w) sericin, 0.5 % (v/w) maltose, 0.3 % (v/w) proline, 0.3% (v/w) glutamine and 10% DMSO. This novel freezing medium was compared with the conventional FBS supplemented with DMSO and also with three purchased freezing media with respect to cryopreservation of the P3UI myeloma cell line and Chinese-hamster ovary cells. As a result, the constructed medium containing sericin successfully cryopreserved both cell types as efficiently as the conventional medium of FBS containing 10 % DMSO and was superior to all three of the purchased media. The constructed medium containing sericin also cryopreserved normal human dermal fibroblasts, human epidermal keratinocytes, the rat phaeochromocytoma cell line PC12 and insect (Spodoptera frugiperda) cell line Sf9 as effectively as the conventional medium of FBS and DMSO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据