4.7 Article

Glutaredoxin Regulates Apoptosis in Cardiomyocytes via NFkB Targets Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL: Implications for Cardiac Aging

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 1339-1353

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2009.2791

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 AG024413, P01 AG15885, F30 AG029687A, T32 GM008803, T32 GM07250, T32 EY07157]
  2. VA Merit Review grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiomyocyte apoptosis is a well-established contributor to irreversible injury following myocardial infarction (MI). Increased cardiomyocyte apoptosis is associated also with aging in animal models, exacerbated by MI; however, mechanisms for this increased sensitivity to oxidative stress are unknown. Protein mixed-disulfide formation with glutathione (protein glutathionylation) is known to change the function of intermediates that regulate apoptosis. Since glutaredoxin (Grx) specifically catalyzes protein deglutathionylation, we examined its status with aging and its influence on regulation of apoptosis. Grx1 content and activity are decreased by similar to 40% in elderly (24-mo) Fischer 344 rat hearts compared to adult (6-mo) controls. A similar extent of Grx1 knockdown in H9c2 cardiomyocytes led to increased apoptosis, decreased NF kappa B-dependent transcriptional activity, and decreased production (mRNA and protein) of anti-apoptotic NF kappa B target genes, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. Knockdown of Bcl-2 and/or Bcl-xL in wild-type H9c2 cells to the same extent (similar to 50%) as observed in Grx1-knockdown cells increased baseline apoptosis; and knockdown of Bcl-xL, but not Bcl-2, also increased oxidant-induced apoptosis analogous to Grx1-knockdown cells. Natural Grx1-deficient cardiomyocytes isolated from elderly rats also displayed diminished NF kappa B activity and Bcl-xL content. Taken together, these data indicate diminution of Grx1 in elderly animals contributes to increased apoptotic susceptibility via regulation of NF kappa B function. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 12, 1339-1353.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据