4.8 Article

Inhibition of Rho-kinase affects astrocytoma morphology, motility, and invasion through activation of Rac1

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 65, 期 19, 页码 8792-8800

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0160

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant astrocytomas are highly invasive neoplasms infiltrating diffusely into regions of normal brain. Whereas the molecular and cellular mechanisms governing astrocytoma invasion remain poorly understood, evidence in other cell systems has implicated a role for the Rho-GTPases in cell motility and invasion. Here, we examine how the inhibition or activation of Rho-kinase (ROCK) affects astrocytoma morphology, motility, and invasion. ROCK was inhibited in astrocytoma cells by using 5 to 100 mu mol/L of Y27632 or by expressing the dominant-negative ROCK mutant, RB/PH TT. ROCK activation was achieved by expressing a constitutively active mutant, CAT. ROCK inhibition led to morphologic and cytoskeletal alterations characterized by an increase in the number and length of cell processes, increased membrane ruffling, and collapse of actin stress fibers. Using two-dimensional radial migration and Boyden chamber assays, we show that astrocytoma migration and invasion were increased at least 2-fold by ROCK inhibition. On the contrary, ROCK activation significantly inhibited migration and invasion of astrocytoma cells. Furthermore, using a Rac-GTP pull-down assay, we show that Rac1 is activated as a consequence of ROCK inhibition. Finally, we show that treatment of astrocytoma cells with small interfering RNA duplexes specific for Rac1-reversed stellation, prevented membrane ruffling formation and abrogated the increased motility observed following treatment with Y27632. Our data show that Rac1 plays a major role in astrocytoma morphology, motility, and invasion. These findings warrant further investigation to determine precisely how the modulation of Rac1 and ROCK can be exploited to inhibit glioma invasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据