4.6 Article

Universal bone densitometry screening combined with alendronate therapy for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is highly cost-effective for elderly women

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 53, 期 10, 页码 1697-1704

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53504.x

关键词

cost-effectiveness; bone densitometry; alendronate; osteoporosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of universal bone densitometry in women aged 65 and older combined with alendronate treatment for those diagnosed with osteoporosis (femoral neck T-score <=-2.5). DESIGN: A Markov model with a lifetime time horizon and eight health states (no fracture, distal forearm fracture, radiographic (but clinically inapparent) vertebral fracture, clinical vertebral fracture, hip fracture, hip and vertebral fracture, and other fractures), using the societal perspective. SETTING: Women living independently and those in nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Caucasian women aged 65, 75, 85, or 95. INTERVENTION: Bone densitometry of the hip, with 5 years of alendronate therapy for those found to have osteoporosis versus no intervention (densitometry or drug therapy). MEASUREMENTS: Lifetime accumulated quality adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: The cost per QALY gained for the screen-and-treat strategy was $43,000 per QALY gained for 65-year-old women and $5,600 per QALY gained for 75-year-old women. For 85- and 95-year-old women, the screen-and-treat strategy was cost saving. Sensitivity analyses showed that the screen-and-treat strategy was cost-effective even under assumptions of reduced adherence to drug therapy, reduced fracture reduction benefit from alendronate therapy, or reduced QALYs saved by preventing fracture. CONCLUSION: Universal bone densitometry combined with alendronate therapy for those found to have osteoporosis is highly cost-effective for women aged 65 and older and may be cost saving for ambulatory women aged 85 and older (whether independently living or residing in nursing homes).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据