4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Improving the delivery of radionuclides for imaging and therapy of cancer using pretargeting methods

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 19, 页码 7109S-7121S

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1004-0009

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB002114] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article reviews the background and current status of pretargeting for cancer imaging and therapy with radionuclides. Pretargeting procedures were introduced similar to 20 years ago as an alternative to directly radiolabeled antibodies. Because they were multistep processes, they were met with resistance but have since progressed to simple and improved procedures that could become the next generation of imaging and therapy with radionuclides. The separation of the radiolabeled compound from the anti body-targeting agent affords pretargeting procedures considerable flexibility in the radiolabeling process, providing opportunities for molecular imaging using gamma- or positron-emitting radionuclides and a variety of beta- and alpha-emitting radionuclides of therapeutic applications. Pretargeting methods improve tumor/ nontumor ratios, exceeding that achieved with directly radiolabeled Fab' fragments, particularly within just a few hours of the radionuclide injection. In addition, tumor uptake exceeds that of a Fab' fragment by as much as 10-fold, giving pretargeting a greatly enhanced sensitivity for imaging. Advances in molecular biology have led to the development of novel binding proteins that have further improved radionuclide delivery in these systems. Studies in. a variety of hematologic and solid tumor models have shown advantages of pretargeting compared with directly radiolabeled IgG for therapy, and there are several clinical studies under way that are also showing promising results. Thus, the next generation of targeting agents will likely employ pretargeting approaches to optimize radionuclide delivery for a wide range of applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据