4.7 Article

Rosiglitazone and 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2, PPARγ agonists, differentially regulate cigarette smoke-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokine release in monocytes/macrophages

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 253-260

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2007.1889

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY017123] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL078603, HL085613, HL086367] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE011390] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES01247, ES07026] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) ligands have the potential for use as anti-inflammatory agents in chronic airway diseases. We hypothesized that cigarette smoke (CS)-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokine release would be downregulated in the monocyte-macrophage cell line (MonoMac6) by synthetic and natural PPAR gamma ligands. Surprisingly, treatment of MonoMac6 cells with the natural PPAR gamma ligand 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) led to increased cytokine (IL-8) release in response to either TNF-alpha or CS extract (CSE). However, exposure to rosiglitazone, a synthetic agonist, led to decreased TNF-alpha, but not CSE, mediated cytokine release. Cytokine release correlated with nuclear PPAR gamma localization; CSE reduced the amount of activated PPAR gamma located in the nucleus and formed aldehyde adducts as PPAR gamma protein carbonyls. Furthermore, it was shown that PPAR gamma interacts with the RelA/p65 subunit of NF-kB under TNF-alpha exposure conditions, but this interaction was disrupted by CS exposure, suggesting that CS blocks this important anti-inflammatory pathway involving PPAR gamma. Thus, these new data show that activation of PPAR gamma with natural or synthetic ligands have differential inhibitory effects on CS-mediated pro-inflammatory mediator release. These data have implications in designing therapies for treatment of COPD and pulmonary fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据