4.5 Article

Antidepressant-like effects of selegiline in the forced swim test

期刊

EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 563-571

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.02.003

关键词

selegiline; forced swim test; locomotor activity; antidepressant; monoamine oxidase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although selegiline, a monoamine oxidase (MAO)-B inhibitor, is reported to exert antidepressant effects in depressant patients, evidence in rodents for effects of selegiline is quite limited. The purpose of the present study was to assess effects of selegiline in the forced swim test (FST) and on locomotor activity, and to investigate whether MAO inhibition or stimulation of receptors contributes to antidepressant-like effects of selegiline. Drugs were subcutaneously administrated. The single administration of reference drug nortriptyline at 5 mg/kg reduced locomotor activity without effects in FST and brain MAO activities. But nortriptyline repeatedly given 24, 5 and 1 h before behavioral tests significantly decreased an immobility time in FST without effects in motor activities, and showed weak brain MAO-B inhibition. Single and following repeated (24, 5 and 1 h before behavioral tests) administrations of selegiline at 10 mg/kg significantly decreased the immobility time in FST, with little motor stimulant effect. In contrast, (+)-methamphetamine caused a marked decrease in immobility time and an increase in locomotor activity. Selegiline at 1 and 3 mg/kg, which failed to decrease immobility time, markedly inhibited brain total-MAO and MAO-B activities. A dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 completely blocked antidepressant-like effects of selegiline, but not dopamine D2, serotonergic or noradrenergic receptor antagonists. These results suggest that selegiline exerts the antidepressant-like effects by prolonging escape-directed behavior rather than by a motor stimulant effect and D1 receptor activation contributes to its effect. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据