4.7 Review

Cancer chemoprevention through dietary antioxidants: Progress and promise

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 475-510

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2007.1740

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA 101039, R01 CA 120451, R01 CA 78809] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P50 DK065303] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA078809, R01CA120451, R01CA101039] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P50DK065303] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is estimated that nearly one-third of all cancer deaths in the United States could be prevented through appropriate dietary modification. Various dietary antioxidants have shown considerable promise as effective agents for cancer prevention by reducing oxidative stress which has been implicated in the development of many diseases, including cancer. Therefore, for reducing the incidence of cancer, modifications in dietary habits, especially by increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables rich in antioxidants, are increasingly advocated. Accumulating research evidence suggests that many dietary factors may be used alone or in combination with traditional chemotherapeutic agents to prevent the occurrence of cancer, their metastatic spread, or even to treat cancer. The reduced cancer risk and lack of toxicity associated with high intake of fruits and vegetables suggest that specific concentrations of antioxidant agents from these dietary sources may produce cancer chemopreventive effects without causing significant levels of toxicity. This review presents an extensive analysis of the key findings from studies on the effects of dietary antioxidants such as tea polyphenols, curcumin, genistein, resveratrol, lycopene, pomegranate, and lupeol against cancers of the skin, prostate, breast, lung, and liver. This research is also leading to the identification of novel cancer drug targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据