4.6 Article

Bordetella type III secretion modulates dendritic cell migration resulting in immunosuppression and bacterial persistence

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 175, 期 7, 页码 4647-4652

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.7.4647

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI053075, R01 AI053075-01A1, R01 AI053075-02, R01 AI053075-03, R01 AI053075-05, AI049346, R01 AI053075-04, AI053075] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic bacterial infection reflects a balance between the host immune response and bacterial factors that promote colonization and immune evasion. Bordetella bronchiseptica uses a type III secretion system (TTSS) to persist in the lower respiratory tract of mice. We hypothesize that colonization is facilitated by bacteria-driven modulation of dendritic cells (DCs), which leads to an immunosuppressive adaptive host response. Migration of DCs to the draining lymph nodes of the respiratory tract was significantly increased in mice infected with wild-type B. bronchiseptica compared with mice infected with TTSS mutant bacteria. Reduced colonization by TTSS-deficient bacteria was evident by 7 days after infection, whereas colonization by wild-type bacteria remained high. This decrease in colonization correlated with peak IFN-gamma production by restimulated splenocytes from infected animals. Wild-type bacteria also elicited peak IFN-gamma production on day 7, but the quantity was significantly lower than that elicited by TTSS mutant bacteria. Additionally, wild-type bacteria elicited higher levels of the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10 compared with the TTSS mutant bacteria. B. bronchiseptica colonization in IL-10(-/-) mice was significantly reduced compared with infections in wild-type mice. These findings suggest that B. bronchiseptica use the TTSS to rapidly drive respiratory DCs to secondary lymphoid tissues where these APCs stimulate an inummosuppressive response characterized by increased IL-10 and decreased IFN-gamma production that favors bacterial persistence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据