4.7 Article

Effects of Phage Endolysin SAL200 Combined with Antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus Infection

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00731-18

关键词

Staphylococcus aureus; phage; endolysin; synergism

资金

  1. SNUH Research Fund [04-2015-0210]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education [NRF-2016R1D1A1A02936919]
  3. Korean Health Technology R&D Projects - Ministry for Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI17C1395]
  4. iNtRON Biotechnology, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phages and their derivatives are increasingly being reconsidered for use in the treatment of bacterial infections due to the rising rates of antibiotic resistance. We assessed the antistaphylococcal effect of the endolysin SAL200 in combination with standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotics. The activity of SAL200 when it was combined with SOC antibiotics was assessed in vitro by checkerboard and time-kill assays and in vivo with murine bacteremia and Galleria mellonella infection models. SAL200 reduced the SOC antibiotic MICs and showed a >= 3-log(10)-CFU/ml reduction of Staphylococcus aureus counts within 30 min in time-kill assays. Combinations of SAL200 and SOC antibiotics achieved a sustained decrease of >2 log(10) CFU/ml. SAL200 significantly lowered the blood bacterial density within 1 h by >1 log(10) CFU/ml in bacteremic mice (P < 0.05 versus untreated mice), and SAL200 and SOC antibiotic combinations achieved the lowest levels of bacteremia. The bacterial density in splenic tissue at 72 h postinfection was the lowest in mice treated with SAL200 and SOC antibiotic combinations. SAL200 combined with SOC antibiotics also improved Galleria mellonella larva survival at 96 h postinfection. The combination of the phage endolysin SAL200 with SOC antistaphylococcal antibiotics showed synergistic effects in vitro and in vivo. The combination of SAL200 with SOC antibiotics could help in the treatment of difficult-to-treat S. aureus infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据