4.4 Article

Nurses' perceptions of the challenges related to the Omanization policy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW
卷 62, 期 4, 页码 462-469

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/inr.12221

关键词

Expatriate; Localization; Ministry of Health; Nursing; Oman; Omanization; Qualitative research; Workforce

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundHuman resource development has become a major concern in Oman since the inception of the Omanization' policy in 1988. The main goal of this policy was to replace the expatriate nursing workforce with similarly qualified local nurses to develop a sustainable workforce and achieve self-reliance. AimThe aim of this study is to explore the nurses' perceptions of Omanization policy. MethodsA qualitative research design was used and 16 Omani registered nurses and 26 student nurses were interviewed indepth. Transcribed data were analysed using content analysis. ResultsTwo main themes emerged from the data: Challenges of sustaining the local nursing workforce' and Challenges of educational preparation for local nurses'. The participants agreed that Omanization benefited national development, social stability and ensuring local workforce. The challenges faced were cultural and work life balance, preparation of nurses and pace of replacement. ConclusionThe participants were concerned that the pace of replacement could leave behind a marked experience gap. A slow-phased approach to Omanization of the nursing workforce was recommended by the participants. LimitationsResults obtained from this study reflect the perceptions and voices of student nurses and registered nurses only from the Institute of Nursing and Oman Ministry of Health. Implications for nursing education and policyA policy of this magnitude requires gradual establishment. The upgrading of the nursing education to degree level, continuous professional development, mentoring and role modeling of expert nurses should be established to prepare local nurses for the localization of the nursing workforce.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据