4.4 Article

Adverse events in nursing: A retrospective study of reports of patient and relative experiences

期刊

INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 377-385

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/inr.12192

关键词

Communication; Nursing; Nursing Care; Patient Participation; Patient Safety; Qualitative Methods; Research; Adverse Events

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPatient safety is an important global issue. While it is well known that patients can suffer from adverse events in nursing care, there is a lack of knowledge as to how they experience them. AimTo examine adverse events in nursing care as they are experienced by patients and relatives. MethodsThis was a retrospective study taking both a qualitative and a quantitative approach. It was based on data regarding 242 adverse events in nursing care, as reported by patients and relatives to Sweden's Medical Responsibility Board, content analysis was used to analyse the reports. ResultsPatients' and relatives' experiences were analysed into four categories of adverse events, as concerning participation, clinical judgement, nursing intervention and the essentials of care. LimitationsThe reports were classified by the Medical Responsibility Board, without a standardized system. The adverse events reported were few in number and were reported by patients and relatives only. ConclusionLack of participation has negative consequences and contributes to adverse events. Adverse events occur through missed care as well as through carer errors. Implications on nursing and health practiceNurses need to improve their skills that support patient participation. Patient participation needs to be incorporated into nurses' duties. Implications for Nursing and Health PolicyResources for patients to participate in their own care needs to be a priority underpinning policy-making in health systems. Nursing education systems need to teach students about the value and benefits of involving patients in their care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据