4.7 Article

Rapid Conversion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to a Spherical Cell Morphotype Facilitates Tolerance to Carbapenems and Penicillins but Increases Susceptibility to Antimicrobial Peptides

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 1956-1962

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01901-13

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [571905]
  2. ithree institute Postdoctoral Fellowship
  3. UTS Chancellor's Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [571905] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Gram-negative human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa tolerates high concentrations of beta-lactam antibiotics. Despite inhibiting the growth of the organism, these cell wall-targeting drugs exhibit remarkably little bactericidal activity. However, the mechanisms underlying beta-lactam tolerance are currently unclear. Here, we show that P. aeruginosa undergoes a rapid en masse transition from normal rod-shaped cells to viable cell wall-defective spherical cells when treated with beta-lactams from the widely used carbapenem and penicillin classes. When the antibiotic is removed, the entire population of spherical cells quickly converts back to the normal bacillary form. Our results demonstrate that these rapid population-wide cell morphotype transitions function as a strategy to survive antibiotic exposure. Taking advantage of these findings, we have developed a novel approach to efficiently kill P. aeruginosa by using carbapenem treatment to induce en masse transition to the spherical cell morphotype and then exploiting the relative fragility and sensitivity of these cells to killing by antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that are relatively inactive against P. aeruginosa bacillary cells. This approach could broaden the repertoire of antimicrobial compounds used to treat P. aeruginosa and serve as a basis for developing new therapeutic agents to combat bacterial infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据