4.5 Article

Cathodal current-induced vasodilation to single application and the amplified response to repeated application in humans rely on aspirin-sensitive mechanisms

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 99, 期 4, 页码 1538-1544

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00258.2005

关键词

prostaglandins; iontophoresis; primary afferent fibers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assumed to rely on an axon reflex, the current-induced vasodilation (CIV) interferes with the microvascular response to iontophoretic drug delivery. Mechanisms resulting in CIV are likely different at the anode and at the cathode. While studies have been conducted to understand anodal CIV, little information is available on cathodal CIV. The present study investigates CIV observed following 0.1-mA cathodal applications on forearms of healthy volunteers and the possible mechanisms involved. Results are expressed in percentage of the cutaneous heat-induced maximal vascular conductance [%MVC (means +/- SE)]. 1) The amplitude of CIV was proportional to the duration of cathodal currents for periods of <1 min: r = 0.99. 2) Two current applications of 10 s, with 10-min interstimulation interval, induced a higher peak value of CIV (79.1 +/- 8.6% MVC) than the one obtained with all-at-once 20-s current application (39.5 +/- 4.3% MVC, P < 0.05). This amplified vascular response due to segmental application was observed for all tested interstimulation intervals (up to 40 min). 3) Two hours and 3 days following pretreatment with 1-g oral aspirin, the CIV observed following cathodal application, as well as the difference of cathodal CIV amplitude between all-at-once and segmented applications, were reduced. These findings suggest a role of prostaglandins, not only released from endothelial or smooth muscle cells, as direct vasodilator and/or as a sensitizer. Thus aspirin pretreatment could be used to decrease CIV resulting from all-at-once and repeated cathodal application and facilitate the study of the specific vascular effect induced by the drug delivered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据