4.7 Article

Oritavancin Activity against Staphylococcus aureus Causing Invasive Infections in U. S. and European Hospitals: a 5-Year International Surveillance Program

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 58, 期 5, 页码 2921-2924

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02482-13

关键词

-

资金

  1. The Medicines Company (Parsippany, NJ) via the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program platform
  2. The Medicines Company
  3. Achaogen
  4. Aires
  5. American Proficiency Institute (API)
  6. Anacor
  7. Astellas
  8. AstraZeneca
  9. bioMerieux
  10. Cempra
  11. Cerexa
  12. ContraFect
  13. Cubist
  14. Dipexium
  15. Enanta
  16. Furiex
  17. GlaxoSmithKline
  18. Johnson Johnson
  19. LegoChem Biosciences, Inc.
  20. Meiji Seika Kaisha
  21. Nabriva
  22. Novartis
  23. Pfizer
  24. PPD Therapeutics
  25. Premier Research Group
  26. Rempex
  27. Rib-X Pharmaceuticals
  28. Seachaid
  29. Shionogi
  30. Theravance
  31. Thermo Fisher

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, oritavancin had modal MIC, MIC50, and MIC90 values of 0.03, 0.03, and 0.06 mu g/ml, respectively, against Staphylococcus aureus. Similar results (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 mu g/ml) were observed against methicillin-resistant and -susceptible isolates and those demonstrating multidrug-resistant (MDR) and non-MDR phenotypes. When oritavancin (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/ml) was tested against S. aureus with elevated MIC values for daptomycin (i.e., 1 to 4 mg/ml) and vancomycin (i.e., 2 mg/ml), it showed MIC results 2-fold higher than those for the more susceptible vancomycin or daptomycin counterparts (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/ml), yet it inhibited these isolates at <= 0.25 mg/ml.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据