4.7 Article

Fluid secretion and the Na+K+2Cl- cotransporter in mouse exorbital lacrimal gland

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 289, 期 4, 页码 C860-C867

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00526.2004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY-014604] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluid secretion and the Na+-K+-2Cl(-) cotransporter in mouse exorbital lacrimal gland. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 289: C860-C867, 2005. First published May 25, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00526.2004. - We have previously suggested that fluid flow in the mouse exorbital lacrimal gland is driven by the opening of apical Cl- and K+ channels. These ions move into the lumen of the gland and water follows by osmosis. In many tissues, the Na+-K+-2Cl(-) cotransporter (NKCC1) replaces the Cl- and K+ ions that move into the lumen. We hypothesize that mouse exorbital lacrimal glands would have NKCC1 cotransporters and that they would be important in fluid transport by this gland. We used immunocytochemistry to localize NKCC1-like immunoreactivity to the membranes of the acinar cells as well as to the basolateral membranes of the duct cells. We developed a method to measure tear flow and its composition from mouse glands in situ. Stimulation with the acetylcholine agonist carbachol produced a peak flow followed by a plateau. Ion concentration measurements of this stimulated fluid showed it was high in K+ and Cl-. Treatment of the gland with furosemide, a blocker of the NKCC1 cotransporter, reduced the plateau phase of fluid flow by similar to 30%. Isolated cells exposed to a hypertonic shock shrank by similar to 20% and then showed a regulatory volume increase (RVI). Both the RVI and swelling were blocked by treatment with furosemide. Cells isolated from these glands shrink by similar to 10% in the presence of carbachol. Blocking NKCC1 with furosemide reduced the amount of shrinkage by similar to 50%. These data suggest that NKCC1 plays an important role in fluid secretion by the exorbital gland of mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据