4.2 Article

Individual differences in metacognitive responsiveness: Cognitive and personality correlates

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 132, 期 4, 页码 446-461

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3200/GENP.132.4.446-461

关键词

attention; gender differences; monitoring; personality; uncertainty

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P01 HD038051-010001, P01 HD038051-070001, P01 HD038051-060001, P01 HD038051-06, P01 HD038051, P01 HD038051-050001, P01 HD038051-07, P01 HD038051-040001, P01 HD038051-08, P01 HD038051-030001, P01 HD038051-020001, P01 HD038051-080001, P01 HD038051-067038, P01 HD038051-05] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individuals differ not only in the ability to make decisions, but also in the degree to which they respond adaptively to uncertainty about those decisions. We examined how optimally 124 participants used an uncertain response on near-threshold trials of a psychophysical task. All participants showed overconfidence, but women tended to be more adaptive than men in responsiveness to uncertainty. Participants who responded to uncertainty most optimally exhibited more cognitive failures, fewer attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder symptoms, greater need for closure, better attention scanning skills, but larger effects of Stroop-task incongruity compared with participants who were least optimal in responsiveness to uncertainty. These data suggest that response competition might provide a mechanism for the cognitive experience of uncertainty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据