4.5 Article

Gonadotropin control of inhibin secretion and the relationship to follicle type and number in the hpg mouse

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 73, 期 4, 页码 610-618

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.039602

关键词

follicle; follicle number; follicle-stimulating hormone; gonadotropins; hpg; human chorionic gonadotropin; inhibin; ovary; stereology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibin is secreted in two distinct heterodimeric forms, A and El, but the mechanism for the differential control of these two forms is unclear, To evaluate the relationship between secretion of inhibin forms and folliculogenesis, the effects of gonadotropins on inhibin concentrations were studied in parallel with stereological enumeration of ovarian follicle types in gonadotropin-deficient hypogonadal (hpg) female mice treated with recombinant human FSH (10 IU/day), hCG (1 IU/day), or both for 20 days. Treatment with FSH alone significantly increased blood concentrations of both inhibin A and inhibin 13, whereas hCG alone had no effect on either inhibin. The combination of FSH and hCG further increased the concentration of inhibin A but had no effect on the concentration of inhibin 0 beyond that of FSH. The number of primordial follicles per ovary was significantly reduced in FSH-treated hpg mice, but was not affected by hCG treatment. Antral follicles were absent in the untreated hpg mice, present following treatment with FSH, and were present in only limited numbers following hCG treatment alone. Preovulatory follicles were observed only in the wild-type and combined FSH and hCG treatment groups. These results demonstrate that secretion of both inhibins is associated with the presence of antral follicles. Inhibin A secretion is increased by the presence of preovulatory follicles, whereas the concentration of inhibin B is not affected. The observed effects of gonadotropins on inhibin A and B secretion may be explained by corresponding gonadotropin effects on follicle development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据