4.5 Article

Effect-directed analysis of mutagens and ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase inducers in aquatic sediments

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 2445-2458

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1897/05-078R.1

关键词

nonpriority pollutants; mutagenicity; aromatic hydrocarbon receptor-mediated activity; effect-directed analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sediment extracts from a creek in the Neckar river basin (Germany), which received the discharge of treated hospital wastewater, were found to exhibit strong aromatic hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor-mediated effects in a rainbow trout liver cell line (RTL-W1) as well as high mutagenicity ill the Salmonella/microsome assay after fractionation. The crude extract did not exhibit a clear mutagenic response. Apparently, cleanup or fractionation before mutagenicity testing is necessary to minimize the risk of false-negative results. Effect-directed fractionation and analysis were applied to characterize and identify the toxicants that cause these effects. Major ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase induction potency and mutagenicity were detected in different polyaromatic fractions, indicating different sets of toxicants that induce metabolic activation and mutagenicity. Dioxin-like halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons, including polychlorinated biphenyls, naphthalenes, dibenzo-p-dioxins and furans, and priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, contributed to Ah receptor-mediated activity only to a minor extent. Benzo[a.]pyrene, benzo[a]fluoranthene, and perylene could be confirmed as important contributors to mutagenicity. The nonpriority Pollutants 11H-indeno[2,1,7-cde]pyrene, a methylbenzo[e]pyrene, and a methylperylene were tentatively identified as major components, representing 82% of the peak area of a highly mutagenic fraction of the sediment extract. This suggests that hazard and risk assessment of complex environmental mixtures should make increasing attempts to identify and consider hazardous key pollutants rather than focusing on a priori-selected key pollutants alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据