4.7 Article

Multicenter Study of Anidulafungin and Micafungin MIC Distributions and Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Eight Candida Species and the CLSI M27-A3 Broth Microdilution Method

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 916-922

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02020-13

关键词

-

资金

  1. Astellas
  2. Basilea
  3. Merck
  4. Gilead
  5. Pfizer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) using CLSI MICs from multiple laboratories are not available for Candida spp. and the echinocandins, we established ECVs for anidulafungin and micafungin on the basis of wild-type (WT) MIC distributions (for organisms in a species-drug combination with no detectable acquired resistance mechanisms) for 8,210 Candida albicans, 3,102 C. glabrata, 3,976 C. parapsilosis, 2,042 C. tropicalis, 617 C. krusei, 258 C. lusitaniae, 234 C. guilliermondii, and 131 C. dubliniensis isolates. CLSI broth microdilution MIC data gathered from 15 different laboratories in Canada, Europe, Mexico, Peru, and the United States were aggregated to statistically define ECVs. ECVs encompassing 97.5% of the statistically modeled population for anidulafungin and micafungin were, respectively, 0.12 and 0.03 mu g/ml for C. albicans, 0.12 and 0.03 mu g/ml for C. glabrata, 8 and 4 mu g/ml for C. parapsilosis, 0.12 and 0.06 mu g/ml for C. tropicalis, 0.25 and 0.25 mu g/ml for C. krusei, 1 and 0.5 mu g/ml for C. lusitaniae, 8 and 2 mu g/ml for C. guilliermondii, and 0.12 and 0.12 mu g/ml for C. dubliniensis. Previously reported single and multicenter ECVs defined in the present study were quite similar or within 1 2-fold dilution of each other. For a collection of 230 WT isolates (no fks mutations) and 51 isolates with fks mutations, the species-specific ECVs for anidulafungin and micafungin correctly classified 47 (92.2%) and 51 (100%) of the fks mutants, respectively, as non-WT strains. These ECVs may aid in detecting non-WT isolates with reduced susceptibility to anidulafungin and micafungin due to fks mutations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据