4.7 Article

Kinetics and mechanism of cyclic esters polymerization initiated with tin(II) octoate.: Polymerization of ε-caprolactone and L,L-lactide co-initiated with primary amines

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 38, 期 20, 页码 8170-8176

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma050752j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following our previous papers on the mechanism of e-caprolactone (CL) and L,L-lactide (LA) polymerization initiated by tin(II) octoate [(tin(II) bis(2-ethylhexanoate), (Sn(Oct)(2))] in the presence of the hydroxyl-group-containing compounds [H2O, alcohols or hydroxy-earboxylic acids (ROH)] the present work shows that the CL or LA/Sn(Oct)(2)/primary amine (RNH2) system, in principle, does not differ mechanistically from the CL or LA/Sn(Oct)(2)/ROH system. H-1 NMR, matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometric and kinetic studies reveal that, in the first step of polymerization initiated with the Sn(Oct)(2)/RNH2 mixtures, formation of the alpha-amido-omega-alcohol (RNH-m-H (R'OH)) (in which m denotes the repeating unit derived from CL or LA) proceeds. Then, the further steps of polymerization follow with R'OH as co-initiator. Thus, eventually, the Sn(Oct)(2)/RNH2-initiated polymerization proceeds by the monomer insertion into the ...-Sn-OR bond, reversibly formed in the reaction: ...-SnOct + ROH reversible arrow ...Sn-OR + OctH, in which ROH is either the low-molar-mass co-initiator (R'OH) or a macromolecule fitted with the hydroxyl end group (RNH-(m)(n)-H); OctH stands for 2-ethylhexanoic (octanoic) acid. These interconversions take place throughout the entire polymerization process. The Sn(Oct)(2)/amino dendrimer (e.g., commercially available DAB-Am-8 and DAB-Am-32, polyamines, fitted with 8 and 32 primary amino groups) system acts in a similar way. Molar masses of the resulting star-shaped polymer, in which polyester chains bear the hydroxyl end groups, are controlled by the monomer and dendrimer concentrations ratio in the feed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据