4.6 Article

Polvvinvl alcohol/polysulfone (PVA/PSF) hollow fiber composite membranes for pervaporation separation of ethanol/water solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 247-254

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.22131

关键词

pervaporation; phase inversion; polysulfone; hollow fiber membrane; separation factor; poly(vinyl alcohol)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polysulfone (PSF) hollow fiber membranes were spun by phase-inversion method from 29 wt % solids of 29: 65: 6 PSF/NMP/ glycerol and 29: 64: 7 PSF/DMAc/ glycol using 93.5 : 6.5 NMP/water and 94.5 : 5.5 DMAc/ water as bore fluids, respectively, while the external coagulant was water. Polyvinyl alcohol/polysulfone (PVA/PSF) hollow fiber composite membranes were prepared after PSF hollow fiber membranes were coated using different PVA aqueous solutions, which were composed of PVA, fatty alcohol polyoxyethylene ether (AEO(9)), maleic acid (MAC), and water. Two coating methods (dip coating and vacuum coating) and different heat treatments were discussed. The effects of hollow fiber membrane treatment methods, membrane structures, ethanol solution temperatures, and MAC/PVA ratios on the pervaporation performance of 95 wt % ethanol/water solution were studied. Using the vacuum-coating method, the suitable MAC/PVA ratio was 0.3 for the preparation of PVA/PSF hollow fiber composite membrane with the sponge-like membrane structure. Its pervaporation performance was as follows: separation factor (a) was 185 while permeation flux (J) was 30g/m(2)center dot h at 50 degrees C. Based on the experimental results, it was found that separation factor (a) of PVA/PSF composite membrane with single finger-void membrane structure was higher than that with the sponge-like membrane structure. Therefore, single finger-void membrane structure as the supported membrane was more suitable than sponge-like membrane structure for the preparation of PVA/PSF hollow fiber composite membrane. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据