4.6 Article

Potent mechanism-based inhibitors for matrix metalloproteinases

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 280, 期 40, 页码 33992-34002

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M504303200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-100475] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Matrix metalloproteinases ( MMPs) are zinc-dependent endopeptidases that play important roles in physiological and pathological conditions. Both gelatinases (MMP-2 and - 9) and membrane-type 1 MMP (MMP-14) are important targets for inhibition, since their roles in various diseases, including cancer, have been well established. We describe herein a set of mechanism-based inhibitors that show high selectivity to gelatinases and MMP-14( inhibitor 3) and to only MMP-2 ( inhibitors 5 and 7). These molecules bind to the active sites of these enzymes, initiating a slow binding profile for the onset of inhibition, which leads to covalent enzyme modification. The full kinetic analysis for the inhibitors is reported. These are nanomolar inhibitors (K-i) for the formation of the noncovalent enzyme-inhibitor complexes. The onset of slow binding inhibition is rapid (k(on) of 10(2) to 10(4) M-1 s(-1)), and the reversal of the process is slow (k(off) of 10(-3) to 10(-4) s(-1)). However, with the onset of covalent chemistry with the best of these inhibitors ( e. g. inhibitor 3), very little recovery of activity (< 10%) was seen over 48 h of dialysis. We previously reported that broad spectrum MMP inhibitors like GM6001 enhance MT1-MMP-dependent activation of pro-MMP-2 in the presence of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2. Herein, we show that inhibitor 3, in contrast to GM6001, had no effect on pro-MMP-2 activation by MT1-MMP. Furthermore, inhibitor 3 reduced tumor cell migration and invasion in vitro. These results show that these new inhibitors are promising candidates for selective inhibition of MMPs in animal models of relevant human diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据