4.6 Article

Solution and solid phase electrochemical behaviour of [Os(bpy)3]3[P2W18O62]

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 281-288

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.04.027

关键词

heteropolyanion; bipyridine; adsorption; solid state

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[Os(bpy)(3)](3)]P2W18O62] has been synthesised and characterised by elemental analysis, spectroscopic (UV-vis, IR spectroscopy) and electrochemical techniques. In 0.1 M Bu4NPF6 DMSO the complex shows a series of redox couples associated with the Os3+/2+ and bipyridine ligands of the cationic [Os(bpy)(3)](2+) moiety and the tungsten-oxo framework of the associated Dawson parent heteropolyanion, [P2W18O62](6-). At this electrolyte concentration, the Os3+ redox form of the complex was seen to adsorb onto the electrode surface. When the electrolyte concentration is lowered to 0.01 M Bu4NPF6 in addition to the Os3+/2+ redox couple, the redox process associated with the [P2W18O62](8-/7-) couple also exhibited properties indicating surface based processes were present. Electroactive films of the complex were formed on carbon macroelectrodes by the redox switching of the transition metal within the complex. Voltammetric investigations into the film's behaviour in a range of buffer solutions (pH 2.0, 4.5 and 7.0) were performed. The films were found to possess better stability in acidic pH and the same pH dependence for the tungsten-oxo framework of the heteropolyanions as in solution. Solid state electrochemical measurements on mechanically attached microparticles of the complex were performed, with the effect of both the nature and concentration of the aqueous electrolyte on this behaviour being investigated. Upon redox switching between the Os2+/3+ redox states, there is an associated insertion/expulsion of anions from/to the solution phase. Scanning electron micrographs of these solid state films were attained before and after redox cycling. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据