4.7 Article

Reduction of raf-1 kinase inhibitor protein expression correlates with breast cancer metastasis

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 20, 页码 7392-7397

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0283

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Raf-1 kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP) was originally identified as the first physiologic inhibitor of the Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway. This pathway regulates fundamental cellular functions, including those that are subverted in cancer cells, such as proliferation, transformation, survival, and metastasis. Recently, RKIP has been recognized as a strong candidate for a metastasis suppressor gene in cell and animal model systems. Therefore, we investigated whether RKIP expression is altered in clinical specimens of human primary breast cancers and their lymph node metastases. Experimental Design: Paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 103 breast cancer patients were examined immunohistochemically for the expression of RKIP, activated ERK, and apoptosis. The specificity of the antibodies used was validated by competition experiments with purified recombinant RKIP protein. Results: RKIP expression was high in breast duct epithelia and retained to varying degrees in primary breast tumors. However, in lymph node metastases, RKIP expression was highly significantly reduced or lost (P = 0.000003). No significant correlations were observed between RKIP expression and histologic type, tumor differentiation grade, size, or estrogen receptor status. Conclusion:This is the first study of RKIP expression in a large clinical cohort. It confirms the results of cell culture and animal studies, suggesting that in human breast cancer, RKIP is a metastasis suppressor gene whose expression must be down-regulated for metastases to develop. RKIP expression is independent of other markers for breast cancer progression and prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据